- gallaghermartin
- Jul 14, 2019
- 4 min read
It’s time to talk about anti-Gypsyism in politics.
Brexit and Boris can do one for a minute, as this week’s hot topic is anti-Semitism. You would think there’s an election looming, wouldn’t you?
It is now time to include anti-Gypsyism within the conversation of racism and discrimination within politics. Not just a single party, but for all parties. Political parties have allowed Councillors and MPs to use ‘Parliamentary Privilege’ to describe Gypsies, Roma and Travellers in the most toxic of manners and there is no outrage, nobody held accountable for their comments or the harm they can do and honestly, nobody seems to care.
Below are some examples of what I mean:
A few years ago, a Councillor Alan Mellins said this in a meeting on how to speed up the eviction process for an unauthorised site:
You would have thought that this violence-inciting rhetoric would have lessened due to severe punishments by now, right?
Nah.
April 2019, Councillor Bob Murray said in an online conversation about an unauthorised encampment in his area, (WHICH IS TWENTY MINUTES FROM MY HOUSE), his input was that ‘Hitler had the right idea’ about Gypsies, Roma and Travellers and asked if anybody had “any gas canisters”. (This is currently under investigation of hacking claims)
Paul Beresford (I won’t call him ‘Sir’, for obvious reasons), again, in April 2019 called GRT people currently travelling a ‘disease’.
I complained to the Conservative complaints department about these comments and as it was during a debate in the House of Commons, Beresford has ‘Parliamentary Privilege’ and I was informed by the investigating officer that the Code of Conduct states:
“In no way should anything in this code interfere with an elected representative carrying out his or her duties and exercising his or her judgement in relation to his or her work…”
…and my complaint was then flat out dismissed.
I then got this reply from Mr Speaker’s Office:
Subject to the rules of order in debate, Members may state whatever they think fit in debate, however offensive it may be to the feelings or injurious to the character, of individuals, and they are protected by this privilege from any action for libel, as well as from any other question or molestation”.
Whilst there is a ready acknowledgement that Members’ freedom of speech should be used responsibly, it is basic to that freedom that it should not be curtailed by the Speaker, unless there has been some breach of the House’s own rules.“
Shot down there too, unfortunately.
So now where do I go following my complaints, here in July, as Councillor Phillip Owen, labels GRT people as a ‘biblical plague’ during a meeting on a horse fair, which he deemed to be “imposed on the local community.” (Shout out to the Councillor who left and called the comments “disgusting”).
Now, I (like any person with morals) applaud any person who fights for equality and welcome any change in policy which supports diverse communities. The spotlight on racism and discrimination should be talked about across the board. It just frustrates me that racism within politics is only used a political weapon. It seems, much like how Brexit is all we ever talk about, anti-Semitism is currently as a tool to damage the reputation of a political party, rather than being highlighted for the life-threatening issue that is truly is.
Anyone that knows me is fully aware I’m not one to just moan about things like this. I’ve taken action on all of the above, made formal complaints, followed the protocol, yet due to ‘Parliamentary Privilege’, it seems these politicians who spotlight their views of discrimination or racism are untouchable. My local MP did submit a very powerful letter to Mr Speaker, highlighting that “were these remarks made about any other ethnic group there would quite rightly be calls for the remarks to be withdrawn”. We all know that Mr Tami MP is right! This is why we need to be highlighting ALL forms of discrimination. We should never choose to talk about one form of discrimination and racism instead of, just because the media is pushing it into our faces 24/7, but we need to highlight and speak about racism that different communities suffer across the board. Especially within politics… Love it or hate it, it impacts your life every day.
Now, according to Nolan’s ‘Principles of Public Life’, ‘accountability’ and ‘leadership’ are key to being a public figure in our community. Why then, when it comes to challenging the racist rhetoric against Travellers, Roma and Gypsies, do these principles not apply?
It makes me laugh when I read the social media comments on articles about Travellers and Gypsies, sometimes easily reaching into the 100’s, saying that “they’re untouchable”, or “above the law”, going as far as to cull, or execute us, when actually, it seems that our elected representatives can normalise the perception that we are a disease, or that “Hitler had the right idea”. What happens next?
People get hurt, or killed is what happens. Johnny Delaney’s murderers told the police that they killed Delaney as “he was only a Gypsy”. This mentality towards has not gone away, and is in fact, worsening and making the UK a very dangerous place to be, due to the people in power who are supposed to facilitate a better life for all of their constituents, allowing these racist views to become public, go unopposed and unpunished..
I refuse to give up my fight for equality but how do we ever hope to build communities which accept the GRT community when our decision makers can be so blatantly racist, it is widely accepted and they can’t be held to account?
So yes, let’s celebrate the steps forward in tackling anti-Semitism but also let us not forget the discrimination that Muslims face, LGBTQI+ groups face, and let us finally introduce to the conversation anti-Gypsyism and tackle the racism and discrimination that stares us right in the face daily.
Anyways, thanks again for readying and have a good weekend!
Martin